Sound Transit

2008 Voters Guide - General Election

 

2008 Endorsements for Ballot Measures

After careful consideration, Friends of Seattle endorses the following ballot measures.

Parks Levy, City Proposition 2
Sound Transit, Regional Proposition 1
Pike Place Market Levy, City Proposition 1

 

Vote YES on the Parks Levy, Proposition 2

This November, Seattleites will be asked to vote on a new Pro Parks Levy. We wrote an op-ed asking for this measure to be on the ballot, and now we believe it deserves your support. Here's why we're endorsing it:

Parks and green open spaces are a vital part of a sustainable, livable Seattle. The Pro Parks Levy, which expires at the end of this year, brought us neighborhood gems such as Cal Anderson Park, Ballard Commons Park, Greenwood Park, the Central Area's Homer Harris Park, Greenwood Park, and Northgate Park, as well as many other new green spaces and natural area restoration projects - over 40 acres in all. With a rapidly growing city, Seattle needs a fresh round of investments in green infrastructure - parks, sports facilities, walking trails, creek corridors, and natural drainage systems.

Proposition 2 includes $24 million for new parks in our urban villages, and $6 million for purchase of green spaces. It will fund the rehabilitation of 23 playgrounds, 4 new sportsfields, and stream and forest restoration, improve parts of the Burke-Gilman trail, as well as many other major parks projects across the city. The levy also provides for a robust Opportunity Fund which will allow neighborhoods to access money for additional community projects over the course of the levy. With the 2000 Pro-Parks Levy expiring, now is the time to make sure Seattle's parks and green spaces keep pace with the City's continued growth. Green infrastructure isn't a luxury; it's essential to meet our human needs and environmental responsibilities.

Friends of Seattle urges your "YES" vote on the Pro Parks Levy this fall.

More information: Here are the Council's ordinance, resolution, and attachments related to the parks levy. In particular, this PDF has tons of information about the projects and the funding for them.

Want to help? Join the Seattle Parks for All campaign - visit www.seattleparksforall.org. You can donate your time or money (or both,) and join with your neighborhood to help spread the word on the Parks Levy.

Vote YES on Sound Transit, Proposition 1

We finalized our endorsement decision after our informational event on Sept. 9.

We don't have to spend so much time stuck in traffic, breathing polluted air and warming the planet. This fall, vote for Sound Transit, vote for 36 new light-rail miles, 100,000 hours of new bus service every year, a First Hill streetcar, and more Sounder commuter-rail trips. Sail along rail from Northgate to Seattle in 15 minutes, zoom across 520 on bus rapid transit. The time for transit is now.

Every year that we postpone our shared transportation future, we continue the failures of those who came before us. In 1912, Seattle voters rejected a master plan for the city that would have built a 90-mile-long rapid-transit system with 33 subway miles. In 1968 and 1970, King County voters said no to the "Forward Thrust" rapid-transit plan, declining to accept hundreds of millions dollars in federal funding. That's the past.

It's time to turn to the future. For the cost of about 18 gallons of gas---just $69 per person per year---we can build a system with the capacity to carry one million riders per year. These transportation alternatives will help Seattle build more of the walkable, people-first neighborhoods we all want. Sound Transit expansion will help eliminate tons of greenhouse gas emissions, and will give us high-capacity rail infrastructure that makes us less vulnerable to the price of gas.

Sound Transit's Central Link trains will begin running at the end of next year, connecting downtown and South Seattle neighborhoods, all the way to the airport. And we can continue making short-term improvements in our bus system and other transportation infrastructure. But we aspire for more.

Please join us in voting for Proposition 1.

More information: To learn more about the package, visit the Sound Transit 2 website, the write-ups about our Q&A event in September, and the Mass Transit Now campaign site.

Want to help? Join the the Mass Transit Now campaign.

Vote YES on the Pike Place Market Levy, Proposition 1

When you think of what makes Seattle special, no doubt the Pike Place Market comes to mind. This fall, voters are asked to to approve a $73 million Market Levy, and we endorse this ballot measure. Here's why:

The Pike Place Market is the nation's oldest public farmers' market, turning 101 years old in 2008. It provides a public venue for locals and tourists alike, offers a central meeting place along the backbone of the city, and connects farms and craftspeople directly to buyers.

This levy includes largely physical upgrades to the Market: badly needed piping, seismic, and infrastructure improvements, more and better public restrooms, and elevator upgrades and additions. With the last Levy in the 1970's, it's time to make a new investment in a critical piece of Seattle's past and future.

Please vote "YES" on the Market Levy.

2007 Voters Guide - General Election

 

2007 Endorsements for Ballot Measures

 

Vote Yes on Roads and Transit, Proposition 1

FoS carefully weighed the Roads and Transit package. Indeed, FoS was disappointed to see the package include suburban highway expansion. But FoS was encouraged by RTID's pledge to implement congestion pricing. And on balance, the package's imperfections are outweighed by the improvements the package will deliver for Seattle – 50 new miles of light rail, a Capitol Hill-First Hill streetcar, new bus ramps from I-5 and the Spokane Street Viaduct, a two-way Mercer boulevard, and other mobility projects. Additionally, the package will finance a study of light rail expansion within the city of Seattle, including lines connecting Burien, West Seattle, Ballard, the U District, and downtown. That is the kind of transportation network that Seattle must build to achieve the Friends of Seattle vision of a Seattle that grows substantially yet becomes more livable as it densifies.

The FoS political committee led the endorsement process. The committee evaluated all sides of the issue by reaching out to partner groups, stakeholders and local thought-leaders for information and political analysis. The steering committee approved the endorsement by more than a two-thirds vote.

 

2007 Endorsements for Seattle City Council

 

Process and Criteria

After carefully evaluating the candidates vying for election to the Seattle City Council, the Friends of Seattle steering committee decided to endorse the following candidates.

Jean Godden, Position 1
Bruce Harrell, Position 3
Tom Rasmussen, Position 5
Tim Burgess, Position 7
Sally Clark, Position 9

We sought candidates with enough past successes to indicate they would be capable elected representatives. More than that, we sought candidates who supported (1) development of a surface/transit replacement for the Alaskan Way Viaduct, (2) robust affordable housing policies, (3) zoning for more density downtown and in areas served by transit, (4) more mass transit, (5) better infrastructure for biking and walking, (6) vibrant parks and more open space, and (7) other policies necessary for sustaining urban life. No candidate is perfect on our issues. Indeed, we were prepared to withhold our endorsement in any race, if necessary. But we are confident that our five selections will be effective councilmembers whose positions are sufficiently aligned with our objectives for the next four years.

The FoS political committee led the endorsement process. The committee evaluated the candidates' written answers to a questionnaire it designed, and also interviewed each candidate. The steering committee approved each endorsement by at least a two-thirds vote. For more information about the FoS steering committee, please click here. If you have any questions or comments about our endorsements, please contact Political Chair Brendan Donckers or President Gary Manca .

Pos. 1: Jean Godden

We endorse Jean Godden for re-election to Position 1. During her first term in office, Godden ably chaired the Energy & Environmental Policy Committee. Under her leadership, utility rates dropped 8.4% and Seattle City Light became carbon neutral. We are encouraged by her promises for her second term. After having voted in favor of more density and the $19/sq. ft. affordable housing fee downtown, Godden supports zoning revisions to allow more density near downtown and along transit corridors. Godden also is a leader on transportation issues and has pledged that mass transit will be a priority for her next term. In fact, in her first term she supported the Bicycle Master Plan and defied opposition from businesses when she voted for a higher parking tax. Now she plans to push for an expansion of the streetcar network to Capitol Hill and the University District, and she is open to a new surface/transit plan to move people and freight in place of the Alaskan Way Viaduct. Last but not least, she plans to advocate for new broadband technology infrastructure. In short, we are confident Godden will continue to vote for a greater Seattle, and we look forward to another four years of her leadership.

Pos. 3: Bruce Harrell

We endorse Bruce Harrell for Position 3. In this race Harrell is unique. He has a proven track record of strong leadership, creative problem-solving, and representing the underrepresented. For example, when small businesses in South Seattle were threatened with extinction because of light rail construction, Harrell helped form the $50 million Rainier Valley Community Development Fund and later served as its general counsel. In other instances, he has litigated class action claims against large corporations and won substantial settlements for clients who suffered employment discrimination. Harrell, who grew up in Seattle, also has participated in the Clean Dreams program and is a member of Social Venture Partners. Without question, he has gone to bat for worthy causes all his life.

Now we believe the whole city can benefit from his determined advocacy. Already familiar with the ins and outs of light rail construction, Harrell has pledged to be the most visible mass transit advocate on Council and to work with regional and state leaders to solve Seattle's transit woes. We are confident he will be successful given his advocacy skills and his relationships with King County Executive Ron Sims and state legislative leaders Frank Chopp and Ed Murray, all of who endorsed Harrell. On the Viaduct issue, Harrell agrees that a rebuild must be avoided and a surface/transit alternative fully explored. He wants to see more density in Seattle's urban centers and major transportation corridors. When it comes to parks, Harrell, as a youth sports coach and avid sportsman himself, fully understands how important open space is to our quality of life.

Harrell's skills would further benefit the city in the areas of budgeting and housing policy. As an attorney with a national municipal finance law firm, Harrell became familiar with how cities raise money and increase their bond ratings. This background leads him to believe that useful tools such as land banking, a growth related housing fund, and property tax abatements could make housing more affordable for low and middle income Seattle residents. Unquestionably, Harrell's skills and practical knowledge set Harrell apart in this race.

Pos. 5: Tom Rasmussen

We endorse Tom Rasmussen for re-election to Position 5. A strong advocate for affordable housing in his first term, Rasmussen promises to do even more in his second term. We were impressed by his push in Olympia last session for legislation to tighten regulations on condo conversions. With the housing levy up for renewal soon, the Council will benefit from Rasmussen's expertise on affordable housing when it decides on the new levy package. He is also passionate about design review and has expressed interest in taking the helm of the Urban Planning Committee. We look forward to working with him on urban development issues during his next term.

Pos. 7: Tim Burgess

We endorse Tim Burgess for Position 7. His broad range of experiences gives him an insightful perspective on how the city works. Furthermore, his endorsement interview showed that he has the skills and passion to be an effective leader and to work with other council members to pass good legislation. Burgess, a neighborhood activist from Queen Anne, has worked as a journalist, a Seattle police detective, and the chair of the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission.

His positions on the issues prove that he is the only candidate for Position 7 who will make Seattle more livable and sustainable as it grows. With his progressive transportation policies, Seattle would enjoy better facilities for biking and walking. Under Burgess's leadership, Seattle would also see the Alaska Way Viaduct torn down and replaced with a comprehensive surface/transit solution. Burgess envisions this multimodal transportation network alongside an expanded park system. With more open space and better ways of getting around, Burgess wants to up-zone in urban centers and along major transportation corridors to accommodate more housing. But these issues are only part of the equation for Seattle neighborhoods vitality and, Burgess correctly recognizes that their livability will suffer if they are unsafe and nightlife is stifled. That is why we appreciate his pro-nightlife stance and the credibility he would bring as a former police detective to the Council as it grapples with public safety issues. Because of his experience and policy positions, Burgess is the best person to be in Position 7 during the next four years as the Council faces key issues - the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan, replacement of the Viaduct, and renewal of the housing and parks levies.

Pos. 9: Sally Clark

We endorse Sally Clark for re-election to Position 9. During her short year and a half on the job, Clark has demonstrated her commitment to the wellbeing of Seattle's neighborhoods. We appreciated her leadership on pedestrian safety, her support for the Complete Streets ordinance, and her vote for the Urban Mobility Plan. Currently, Clark is reassessing the neighborhood planning process. In the future, Clark, who is the Vice Chair of the Housing, Human Services & Health Committee, wants to tweak the housing levy to support middle income residents without decreasing support for low income housing. Always thoughtful and prepared, Clark is qualified to serve four more years on Council.

administrator's picture

Friends of Seattle Endorses YES Vote on Parks Levy, Sound Transit 2, and Pike Place Market Levy

Friends of Seattle has issued the following press release.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 15, 2008

Friends of Seattle Endorses YES Vote on Parks Levy, Sound Transit 2, and Pike Place Market Levy

SEATTLE – After calling in May for a new parks levy, and after hosting an informational event on Sound Transit 2 earlier this month, Friends of Seattle (FoS), a membership-based advocacy organization, is pleased to announce its endorsements of the Seattle Parks for All campaign, the Sound Transit 2 ballot measure, and the Pike Place Market Levy.

administrator's picture

Debating Our Transit Future (Worldchanging Seattle)

Friends of Seattle is in the news.

Julia Levitt, "Debating Our Transit Future," Worldchanging Seattle (10 Sept 2008)

Sound Transit will face voters once again in November with ST2, its new and improved regional transit package. While the promise of improved bus service, the allure of light rail and the like are undeniably enticing, I'm still not sure where I stand on the issue. Will the new high-speed commuter rails bring about the kind of sustainable, dense, happy and prosperous region that I'd like to see in our future ... or will the new transit plan just fuel an outdated model of many miles separating our workplaces from our doorsteps?

To get a better grip on the facts, I went to a refreshingly social kind of town hall meeting last night: policy wonks mingled with hipsters when Friends of Seattle hosted a Sound Transit Q&A at the ultra-cool McLeod Residence in Belltown. After greeting our neighbors (about 25 residents attended, running the gamut from sustainability professionals to grad students and concerned neighborhood activists) and redeeming our drink tickets, we settled into folding chairs in McLeod's narrow gallery space and welcomed our featured guest. Ric Ilgenfritz, Sound Transit's executive director of policy, planning and public administration, did an admirable job keeping his cool while presenting an overview of public transit beneath a flashing disco lamp.

administrator's picture

Sound Transit Explains It All for You (Slog)

Friends of Seattle is in the news. Erica C. Barnett, "Sound Transit Explains It All for You," Slog: The Stranger's Blog (10 Sept 2008)

Last night, Friends of Seattle, a group that promotes urbanism and good environmental policy, hosted a Q&A with Sound Transit staffers, including chief spokesman Ric Ilgenfritz, at McLeod Residence in Belltown. The questions were generally thoughtful, unique, and even surprising—a pleasant change from what you usually hear at these events, which is more along the lines of “Is it going to go by my house?” and “How much will it cost me personally?” (Answers: Probably not, but it benefits the whole city; and about $69 a year.) Here are a few things you might not know about Sound Transit, in Ilgenfritz’s words. (Sound Transit haters, take note: This is all from Sound Transit’s perspective. If you disagree, feel free to let me know in the comments.) On ridership, and whether Sound Transit will pay for itself: “By 2030, we expect 360,000 daily riders with a capacity of more than one million. … No transit system anywhere fully funds its operations [with fare revenue].. We’re expecting to recover 45 to 50 percent [of costs] from fares, which is on the high end of the industry standard. … The system will reach a point where the benefits to the economy begin to exceed the costs in around 2034, which is about ten years after operation begins. So it’ll pay for itself.”

Read the whole thing.

Syndicate content