Advocacy

Friends of Seattle's picture

Vote for Proposition 1, Vote for Faster Transit, Safer Streets, More Choices

Friends of Seattle believes that Seattle should be a city where everybody has the freedom to safely walk, bike, or take transit to get where they need to go. That is why we are proud to endorse Seattle's Proposition 1. As an early member of the Streets for All Seattle coalition, Friends of Seattle helped to bring Proposition 1 to the ballot.  Now we urge our members to support the campaign and to vote Yes in November.

Over the next 10 years, Proposition 1 will raise $100 million to give Seattle faster, more reliable transit service; provide for much-needed road maintenance; and allow Seattle to build more sidewalks, improved crosswalks, and more family-friendly bike infrastructure.

Thanks to the recession and several Tim Eyman-backed initiatives, transportation spending has not kept up with demand. Although Proposition 1 will not fill all of our needs, for just $60 a year, it will help us make meaningful improvements to all transportation modes, while putting people to work. Seattle cannot afford to pass up this opportunity.

We need your help to be successful this November. Sign the petition to endorse the campaignTo get involved in the campaign, visit Streets for All Seattle's website, find Streets for All Seattle on Facebookor email Bridgette Maryman. The campaign calendar shows the many opportunities for you to take action with the campaign!

Endorse Proposition One--Faster Transit, Safer Streets, Better Choices
 

Friends of Seattle's picture

Letter to Seattle City Council Supporting New Transit+Bike+Pedestirans+Roads Measure

 

On behalf of its members and supporters, Friends of Seattle signed this letter urging  the members of the Seattle City Council to support a ballot measure that would significantly boost investments in transit, bike and pedestrian infrastructure, and basic road maintenance. The proposed measure is described here (PDF).

 

Dear Seattle City Council Members,

 

We understand that Seattle’s transportation needs far outstrip our available resources, which is why we urge you to place CTAC-III’s full $80 vehicle license fee proposal on the ballot for consideration this November.

 

The proposed package balances two critical needs that will keep Seattle moving:

1.      Funding for maintenance and preservation of the existing transportation network, and

2.      New funding for transportation investments that will support the City’s many pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders. These investments will accelerate the implementation of the City’s Pedestrian Master Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, and Transit Master Plan, providing a solid footing for transit accessibility for underserved communities, future bus rapid transit, streetcars, and electric trolley buses. 

The need for new transportation funds to give Seattleites better choices than just paying at the pump has never been greater. As you know, Seattle faces significant cuts due to King County Metro’s budget crisis. The proposed package will help get Seattle, and our economy, back to work and moving again while maintaining our commitment toward creating a more healthy, socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable city.

 

This local package is significant in another way. If successful, as the polls show it likely will be, this local funding package will also influence the debate about a future state-wide transportation funding package. This is important since Seattle’s values and votes have been vital in securing passage of statewide transportation measures in the past. Our local investments in maintenance, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian infrastructure are not only the right thing to do for Seattle, but send a strong message to Olympia about what our priorities are for a state funding package.

 

Thank you for your consideration and for providing continued mobility, safer streets, high-value job-creation, and lower carbon transportation options to the citizens of Seattle.

 

Sincerely,

 

Chuck Ayers, Executive Director, Cascade Bicycle Club

Thatcher Bailey, Executive Director, Seattle Parks Foundation

Dr. Jonathan Bell, Ballard Neighborhood Doctors

Craig M. Benjamin, Co-Chair, Streets For All Seattle

Jesseca Brand, Program Director, King County Conservation Voters

Leo Brodie, Transition Seattle

Patricia Chase, President, i-SUSTAIN

Jamie Cheney, Executive Director, Commute Seattle

John Coney, Uptown Resident

Barb Culp, Executive Director, Bicycle Alliance

Eric de Place, Ballard Resident 

Phillip Duggan, Pinehurst Resident

Martin Duke, Seattle Transit Blog

Alan Durning, Seattle Resident

Terri Glaberson, Executive Director, Cool Mom

Tim Harris, Executive Director, Real Change News

Jenny Heins, President, Sustainable Ballard

Brock Howell, King County Program Director, Futurewise

Mark Hulscher, President, The Bike Share Group

Dale R. Johnson, Broadview Resident

Ref Lindmark, Co-Chair, CTAC III

Dan Mahle, Program Director, The Art Affect

Gary Manca, President, Friends of Seattle

Brice Maryman, Streets For All Seattle Co-Chair, Board Member, Great City, and Member of CTAC III

Cary Moon, Director, People's Waterfront Coalition

Brady Montz, Chair, Sierra Club Seattle Group

Mo McBroom, Policy Director, Washington Environmental Council

Stacy Noland, Founder & CEO, Moontown Foundation

Estella Ortega, Executive Director, El Centro de la Raza, and Member of CTAC III

Lisa Quinn, Executive Director, Feet First

Shefali Ranganathan, Director of Programs, Transportation Choices Coalition, and Member of CTAC III

Mark Reddington, Partner, LMN Architects

Cindy Riskin, Spokes Person, Easy Riders Bicycle Club

Dave Rodgers, Principal, SvR Design, P.E.

Ben Schiendelman, Seattle Transit Blog

Michael Snyder, Seattle Like Bikes

Peg Staeheli Principal, SvR Design, ASLA

Catherine Stanford, Board Chair, Great City

Renee Staton, Pinehurst Resident

Jack Tomkinson, Urban Sparks

Tom von Schrader, Principal, SvR Design, P.E., and Member of the Steering Committee for the National Complete Streets Coalition

Barbara Wright, Public Health Advocate, Member of CTAC III and the Connecting Washington Task Force

 

Friends of Seattle's picture

Environmental, Social Justice, and Transportation Leaders Call on City Council to Place Transportation Proposal on November Ballot


Streets for All Seattle, of which Friends of Seattle is a coalition member, released this statement today:

 

SEATTLE – Today, environmental, social justice, and transportation leaders sent a letter to the Seattle City Council urging them to place the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee III’s (CTAC-III) full $80 vehicle license fee proposal on the ballot for consideration this November. These investments will not only advance Streets For All Seattle’s goal of creating a more equitable transportation system that prioritizes walking, biking and transit, but will also create local, well-paying green jobs throughout our community.  

 

Last year, Streets For All Seattle launched an ambitious multi-year campaign with the goal of securing $30 million dollars in dedicated annual revenue for walking, biking, and transit infrastructure.  Streets For All Seattle worked closely with the City Council to create a Transportation Benefit District and enact a $20 Councilmanic annual vehicle license fee to help support basic street maintenance and fund pedestrian and bicycle improvements.  The Council then formed the CTAC-III, asking them to undertake a full review of the city’s transportation funding system and evaluate and examine the potential for a ballot measure asking Seattle voters to fund additional transportation projects.

 

Earlier today, the CTAC-III co-chairs, along with SDOT staff, presented the Committee’s recommendations to the City Council acting as the Board of the Seattle Transportation Benefit District.  The proposed CTAC-III package would ask Seattle voters to approve an $80 vehicle license fee, generating approximately $27 million in dedicated annual transportation revenue for walking, biking and transit infrastructure, along with significant money to fix and maintain Seattle streets.

 

“We’d like to thank all of the members of CTAC III for their hard work in listening to a number of community interests and developing a funding proposal to support Seattle’s transportation priorities,” said Craig M. Benjamin, Co-Chair of Streets For All Seattle.  “We look forward to working with the Council to ensure that Seattle voters have an opportunity this Novembers to approve a package of transportation investments that will make our city work for the future.”   

 

“Seattle voters have consistently demonstrated their willingness to pay for transportation investments that reflect our values and priorities,” said Brice Maryman, Co-Chair of Streets For All Seattle and a member of CTAC III.  “We urge the Council to seize this opportunity to put people to work building an equitable transportation system that reduces health disparities and our dependence on oil while allowing everyone the opportunity to safely navigate our city.”

Friends of Seattle's picture

Letter Urges More Housing To Be Allowed By Roosevelt Light-Rail Station

Friends of Seattle joined many individuals and other communitiy organizations to sign the following letter to Mayor Mike McGinn urging him to initiate zoning changes around the future Roosevelt light-rail station to allow for more housing:

 

June 3, 2011

The Hon. Michael McGinn
Mayor, City of Seattle
600 Fourth Avenue, 7th Floor
Seattle, WA 98124-4749

Re: DPD’s Proposed Roosevelt Rezone

Dear Mayor McGinn:

We urge you to take a leadership role regarding DPD’s currently-proposed rezone in Roosevelt.  As you know, several individuals and groups have written to comment on the proposed rezone, which will constrain development capacity within close proximity to the future Roosevelt Sound Transit Station. 

The creation of transit-oriented communities supports the significant public investment in transit that will occur in Roosevelt as a result of the new station.  Transit investments are most effective when combined with opportunities for more people to live, shop and work near the stations.  The Planning Commission’s recent Transit Communities Report identified several communities, including Roosevelt, as areas in which more housing and infrastructure should occur to take advantage of the investment in transit.  Futurewise’s Blueprint report made similar recommendations related to the Roosevelt neighborhood.

The current zoning plan as proposed by DPD constrains development in the station area, a 5-10 minute walk, to primarily single family housing, with only 2-3 blocks of additional NC-65 zoning in the neighborhood core. The core, areas currently zoned for NC3-65, have no proposed increases in density. Other proposed changes are primarily minor single level “step ups” to transition from the slightly larger core to surrounding single family housing (Ex. LR1 to LR2), or character changes (Ex. LR to NC).

All together the current plan will only result in an increase in housing capacity of only 350 units. A majority of this increase is immediately adjacent to I-5, where Sound Transit originally proposed to build the station.

The Roosevelt community successfully lobbied Sound Transit to move the station closer to the heart of the Roosevelt neighborhood in order to create a vibrant neighborhood center.  DPD’s plan does not properly increase capacity in the correct locations to take advantage of the great work accomplished by the Roosevelt community in moving the station, and the plan fails to take advantage of the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to leverage the creation of a transit community in Roosevelt.

We believe that in order to fully take advantage of the transit investment in the Roosevelt neighborhood, and the work accomplished by the Roosevelt community members in moving the station, DPD must undertake a full station area planning effort complete with an Urban Design Framework Plan, similar to the planning efforts in South Seattle, South Lake Union, West Seattle, and other transit-oriented locations.  Such a planning effort must include much higher heights and densities than currently exist in the DPD plan, which will ensure the appropriate level of development in close proximity to the public’s $300 million investment in the Roosevelt Light Rail station.

Sincerely,

Chuck Ayers

Executive Director, Cascade Bicycle Club

 

George Allen

VP, Government Relations, Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce

 

Stephen Antupit

Cowen Park neighbor of the Roosevelt Station

 

Adam Bejan Parast

Seattle Transit Blog

 

Craig Benjamin

Seattle Resident

 

Dan Bertolet

Citytank

John Coney

Seattle Resident

 

Eric de Place

Seattle Resident

 

Martin Duke

Seattle Transit Blog

 

Kevin Futhey

Roosevelt Resident

 

Zach Herrington-Shaner

Seattle Transit Blog

 

Brock Howell

King County Program Director, Futurewise

 

Sean Howell

VP, Friends of Seattle

John Jensen

Seattle Transit Blog

 

Rob Johnson

Executive Director, Transportation Choices Coalition

 

Sherwin Lee

Seattle Transit Blog

 

Gary Manca

President, Friends of Seattle

 

Brice Maryman

Seattle Resident

Dan McGrady

Leadership for Great Neighborhoods

 

Andrew McManama Smith

Roosevelt Resident

 

Ben Schiendelman

Seattle Transit Blog

Jon Scholes

Downtown Seattle Association


Catherine Stanford

Chair, Great City

 

Renee Staton

Leadership for Great Neighborhoods

 

Roger Valdez

Seattle Resident

 

Don Vehige

Ravenna Neighbor of the Roosevelt Station

 

 

 

cc:        The Hon. Sally Bagshaw

            The Hon. Tim Burgess

            The Hon. Sally Clark

            The Hon. Richard Conlin

            The Hon. Jean Godden

            The Hon. Bruce Harrell

            The Hon. Nick Licata

            The Hon. Mike O’Brien

            The Hon. Tom Rasmussen

            Diane Sugimura, Department of Planning and Development

            Marshall Foster, Department of Planning and Development

            Barbara Wilson, Seattle Planning Commission

 

 

Friends of Seattle's picture

A Comment Letter Criticizing the State's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Tunnel

Today, Friends of Seattle mailed a comment letter to the Washington State Department of Transportation ("WSDOT") criticizing its 2010 Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("2010 Draft EIS") for the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement project.  A PDF of the letter is available here.

Friends of Seattle supplemented its letter with exhibits--a CD-ROM containing all the analysis and information provided to WSDOT's Stakeholder Advisory Committee in 2008.  We believe that these documents show that a surface/transit alternative is reasonable and should be included in the final EIS.

Other highlights of our letter:

  • The statement of purpose and need for the project has changed without explanation to focus on capacity for automobiles, and this change is arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law.
  • The Bored Tunnel Alternative fails to meet the needs of the project because, without downtown exits, it will not be used by transit and will not create connections to downtown Seattle.
  • Because the analysis of the effects of tolling is cursory, the 2010 Draft EIS does not adequately analyze the significant adverse effects on the environment that could result.

We also learned today that the Director of the Seattle Department of Transportation wrote a letter to WSDOT laying out city agencies' concerns with the 2010 Draft EIS.  A PDF of this letter from the City is available here.

Friends of Seattle's picture

Tunnel Resolution - Proposed Amendments

On Monday the City Council will vote to approve a resolution that will say the Council intends, in the future, to authorize the city-state agreements necessary to construct a deep bore tunnel.

Friends of Seattle has proposed two amendments (see below) which would affirm the people's power of referendum and would put in writing--for the first time--the Council's belief that the cost overruns provision of RCW 47.01.402(6)(b) is legally unenforceable.

Proposed Amendment - People's Power of Referendum

The Council should allay public fears that the Council plans to find a loophole to avoid the referendum power. Our proposed amendment would reassure the public that Council is acting in good faith and respects the people's ultimate authority to legislate. If Council says no to our proposed amendment, then the question becomes, "Why?" A refusal to adopt it would suggest that the Council does in fact intend to find a way around a referendum.

Proposed Text: "With this Resolution, the City Council does not intend to abridge the people's power to subject city ordinances to a public referendum. Upon the Council's authorization of the agreements attached as Attachments 1, 2 and 3 to this Resolution, the Council recognizes that the people may subject the Council's authorization of the agreements to a referendum, as provided in the City Charter."

Proposed Amendment - Cost Overruns

The resolution says city policy is that Seattle is not liable for cost overruns. However, we think state law is what matters, not city policy. Many councilmembers have joined the City Attorney in saying that the cost overruns provision of RCW 47.01.402(6)(b) is not enforceable. If the Council really believe that the cost overruns provision is legally meaningless, the Council should put it in writing. We have lingering doubts about it, of course. But the city would be better off going on the record. If the Council demurs, our question, given that the above amendment is consistent with their position, again is "Why?"

Proposed Text: "RCW 47.01.402(6)(b) provides that any costs for the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement project 'in excess of two billion eight hundred million dollars shall be borne by property owners in the Seattle area who benefit from replacement of the existing viaduct with the deep bore tunnel.' The City Council believes that this portion of RCW 47.01.402(6)(b) is legally unenforceable, and the State therefore does not presently have the legal authority to levy a tax or special assessment on Seattle area property owners for any cost overruns."

Friends of Seattle's picture

Poll Shows Voters Want Streets for All, Now Let's Party (on Thursday 7/29)

A poll released today by Friends of Seattle shows that voters strongly support the allocation of transportation resources, including funding and road space, for walking, biking, and transit.

So now seems like a good time to remind you that the Streets For All Seattle Kickoff Party and Fundraiser is tomorrow (Thursday), July 29th, 7pm, at Nectar Lounge in Fremont. Details here

Streets For All Seattle is a new coalition of community, labor, social justice, business and environmental groups, including Friends of Seattle, campaigning for more public funds for walking, biking, and transit. Our goal is $30 million dollars in annual dedicated funding. Your support would be invaluable, because as many voices as possible need to be actively engaged in the public debate.

Already, Streets For All Seattle has grown in strength and size: over sixty organizations have endorsed our campaign, we've trained over one hundred volunteers, and thousands of people have signed on in support of our vision. With a lot of hard, rewarding work ahead, Streets For All Seattle is rocking out before the City's budget season begins.

The kickoff will feature:

* Mayor Mike McGinn and members of the City Council
* Streets for All Seattle Jeopardy, featuring members of the Seattle City Council
* Music by:

Hot Bodies in Motion

To the Sea

C-LEB

$10 - $25 - $50 suggested donation

POLL RESULTS

Do you support spending more transportation funds on investments in transit, bicycling and walking?

Yes: 56.8%
No: 27.8%
Not Sure: 15.4%

The results show a solid majority of voters support an increase in funding for walking, biking, and transit. Supporters outnumbered opponents by a ratio of over two to one.

Given limited funds in the city's current transportation budget, would you support greater investment in transit, bicycling and walking if it meant fewer dollars were available for auto-oriented projects?

Support: 49.4%
Oppose: 34.4%
Not Sure: 16.2%

According to the poll, voters are very solid supporters of an increase in funding for walking, biking, and transit, even if car-focused infrastructure becomes a lower priority. Supporters outnumbered opponents by 15 percentage points, which is more than 40% greater than the opposition.

City projects that improve transit efficiency, or make it safer and easier to walk or bicycle, like bus-lanes, pedestrian refuge islands, and bicycle lanes, sometimes require changes in travel lanes or parking on Seattle streets. In general, do you support changes in the configuration of Seattle's streets that make mass transit, walking and bicycling safer and easier?

Support: 62.1%
Oppose: 24.5%
Not Sure: 13.4%

The City of Seattle is re-configuring some of its streets to create bus-priority lanes and make more space for walkers and bikers. The poll results show that voters strongly support these changes.

Compete poll results are available here.

 

Friends of Seattle's picture

Letter Urging Council Not to Repeal Commuter Tax, Offering Amendments if They Do

We sent the below letter via email to the City Council regarding the commuter tax. The Council plans to vote on the cut on Thursday, November 12 or Friday, November 13.

 

Dear Councilmembers,

I am writing to urge you to keep the commuter tax (Employee Hours Tax) and not repeal it during your budget votes on Thursday and Friday. The Council’s concern for Seattle’s businesses is admirable, but this is the wrong solution to the problem -- at $91 per year for the average business, the cut will offer little succor to struggling businesses. Meanwhile, the 20-year Bridging the Gap infrastructure-building program would be robbed of $100 million.

That fiscal hit, together with the city’s likely need to allocate new commercial parking tax revenue and new vehicle fees to the deep-bore tunnel, means the city’s vaunted Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans would become empty gestures. For the foreseeable future, too little funding would be available for sidewalks, bike lanes, and other such improvements. Now is time to make good on the Council’s commitments to build a walkable, bike-friendly, sustainable city. Keep the commuter tax.

If you do choose to cut it, I suggest two amendments to your plans. First, merely suspend the tax and reinstate it in two years when the economy will improve. Second, direct council central staff to prepare a report on the cut’s economic effect, with the report due to the Council in one year. The report should focus on the number of jobs and the amount of economic growth created directly by the cut. That way, the Council will accumulate actual evidence whether tax cutting is sound economic policy.

But the Council should not cut the commuter tax, because the economics tilt in favor of retaining it. Interest rates on municipal bonds are very low, and contractors are submitting low bids for city projects. By borrowing money now against future tax revenue, the city can get the most for the taxpayers’ money while giving the local economy a boost, especially in the beleaguered construction industry. Think of all the new construction projects and new living-wage jobs that will result.

Keeping the commuter tax will create more jobs, allow the city to build when its buying power is greatest, and move the city towards achieving its progressive transportation goals.

Sincerely,

Gary Manca
President, Friends of Seattle
 

Friends of Seattle's picture

Text of the Ordinance that Would Repeal the Commuter Tax

Here is the text of the City Council Bill 116592, the ordinance that would repeal the commuter tax (officially known as the "Employee Hours Tax"). Tim Burgess is the sponsor; the co-sponsors are Sally Clark, Richard Conlin, and Bruce Harrell. The full text is below the jump.

Friends of Seattle's picture

Sally Clark on the Commuter Tax (aka "Head Tax" or "Employee Hours Tax")

Councilmember Sally Clark, writing in the July edition of her "Seattle View" newsletter (the bolding added by us):

If you're overwhelmed reading stories about the down economy, join the club. Budget forecasts look grim for this autumn. Employers large and small continue to shed costs – like workers.  It's disheartening to see employers in our neighborhood business districts close up shop, both because of what that means to sidewalk energy, but also for all of the employees who no longer have income or health coverage.

Earlier this year City Council reviewed ways we can help lessen the impact of the recession and possibly speed recovery. Repeal of the Employee Hours Tax (sometimes known as the "head tax") was one of many ideas listed that could help Seattle businesses. To comply with the EHT, passed in 2006 as part of the Bridging the Gap transportation funding strategy, employers pay $25 for every employee who regularly drives a single occupancy vehicle for their commute. They pay zero on employees who bike, walk or carpool.

[read the rest below the jump]

Syndicate content